Jump to content

DOT heads - variation among models?


Dezza

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does the Ka.... sorry, nearly fucked up there, I mean 750 teapot DOT head have the same inlet port angles and therefore the same potential carb clearance problems as 750k/l heads?

Posted (edited)

The DOT heads have higher inlet ports (appr. 15 mm). Chamber volume and valves are the same.  

Edited by Nik
  • Like 2
Posted

Many thanks for the replies. Does anyone have any direct experience of the angle the carbs sit when mounted on the head re: teapot DOT v 750 slingshot DOT? It is common knowledge the slingshot DOT mounts the carbs at a slightly different angle to non-DOT oil cooled heads but I was wondering if it's the same with the teapot DOT.

Posted (edited)

I can't remember that the carbs are sigificantly more angled on a DOT head, only that the inlets are placed appr. 15 mm higher than other heads. 

I have a bunch, but I am not sure where (too many garages ... :)). I'll see if I can find some and take some photos and measurements. 

Edited by Nik
Posted (edited)

I found when I first started building the gsx1157et (b12 motor) that the tank stat in the right place with the standard b12 head but when I fitted the gsxf dot head the carb top where just hitting the tank by APX 5-10mm ish (didn't Messer it) also I was using gsxr750 38mm carbs and rubbers, don't know if that makes a difference.

 

Ps, FBB maybe the man to ask as he's done one or two head jobs 

Edited by wraith
Add a bit
  • Like 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, wraith said:

I found when I first started building the gsx1157et (b12 motor) that the tank stat in the right place with the standard b12 head but when I fitted the gsxf dot head the carb top where just hitting the tank by APX 5-10mm ish (didn't Messer it) also I was using gsxr750 38mm carbs and rubbers, don't know if that makes a difference.

 

Ps, FBB maybe the man to ask as he's done one or two head jobs 

Yep, that was what I was thinking in regards to buying your teapot 750 DOT head or not.:) I will have a spare Blandit 12 engine to go in a slabby 750 frame as my next  project, (probably to be completed c2030...). I also have some BST 38s to go on it, which as you know are 'tall' compared with other carbs (including RSs) so getting all this in a 750 frame may be a bit of a push, although I will be modifying the stock slabby 750 tank I have regardless.

  • Like 1
Posted

Looks like the 1100 slabby frame gives more clearance than 750 slabby frame. I am looking at cam cover to frame spar clearance here. The BST 38s are definitely taller than the 36s from a Blandit 12 so they wouldn't go on with those rubbers by the look of things. I have the rubbers from a 750L and they bring the carbs very close to the head so they may well just about squeeze in.

Posted
2 minutes ago, wraith said:

I will get some pics later, as I've got a b12 head and this DOT head. I will put them together so we can all see what difference is (y)

Ace!(y)

Posted (edited)

Formidable! The Creme de la Menthe of informative posts:) This is a 750 teapot DOT head but my guess is 750 j/k DOT heads are much of a muchness but a direct comparison would be mightily interesting:) Could you please add the pic to the sticky topic (sounds like a 70s chocolate bar) on carb compatability at the top of the oilcooled section. Otherwise after a while this pic will only be easily retrievable after a search.

Edited by Dezza
Posted

That's great Clive! What are the exact landmarks used to take the measurements to and from? I assume head gasket mating surface to....??? I can then put these into a table and post onto the carb sticky thread.

Posted
3 hours ago, Dezza said:

Looks like the 1100 slabby frame gives more clearance than 750 slabby frame. I am looking at cam cover to frame spar clearance here. The BST 38s are definitely taller than the 36s from a Blandit 12 so they wouldn't go on with those rubbers by the look of things. I have the rubbers from a 750L and they bring the carbs very close to the head so they may well just about squeeze in.

Due to the 1100 engine being taller than a 750 engine ....

I was told the Slabby 750 frame being the lightest made it the ideal base for a 7/11 even though removing the cam cover is a challenge  

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Dezza said:

That's great Clive! What are the exact landmarks used to take the measurements to and from? I assume head gasket mating surface to....??? I can then put these into a table and post onto the carb sticky thread.

 

Measured from top of port to flat of head like this. IMG_20201214_165752.thumb.jpg.a88dd711184a355803659264bee0f8be.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Duckndive said:

 

I was told the Slabby 750 frame being the lightest made it the ideal base for a 7/11 even though removing the cam cover is a challenge  

 Yes it is in my opinion, cam cover does come of my 7/12 but not of my Harris O.o

IMG_20201214_191206.thumb.jpg.c3b5670eb910c33a228f015676110f62.jpg

IMG_20201214_191823.thumb.jpg.252ca3b9677a77d66713cba41f18c095.jpg

Posted

That aspect of the cam cover is not a problem to me; I have been a Harris Magnum 2 owner for 33 years and the engine has to come out to do the valve clearances.

I shall add some of these pics and info to the carb sticky thread along with a new table when I can be arsed. Thanks to all for the help(y)

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Dezza said:

That aspect of the cam cover is not a problem to me; I have been a Harris Magnum 2 owner for 33 years and the engine has to come out to do the valve clearances.

 

Your Harris is air cooled so bigger engine. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...