Jump to content

TonyGee

Members
  • Posts

    4,209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TonyGee

  1. 13 minutes ago, oldscool said:

    Thanks Gixet1460 for having my back. That post wasn't an answer to a 7 year old question! A lot of GSXr riders were asking about that wire not just from this site, so I figured I would check it out and post my findings, every time I write something one of you guys have some kind of smart ass remark. Aren't we supposed to be helping each other out? Stick to what this should be about and use it properly. Keep your comments to yourself unless it's helpful! 

    somebody touched a nerve their !!!!!  "everytime you write something theirs a smart ass remark"  youve only got 2 posts 9_9  time to chill out its just a bit of banter. 

    • Like 3
  2. 1 hour ago, Toecutter said:

    Probably easier to run a separate fuel pump instead of in tank like the 1400. Not a lot of room in the gsx 1100 without major mods. Also loose a bit of fuel capacity. Much easier to transfer bodywork to 1400 frame. But then it's a 1400 with 1100 bodywork on...again not that straight forward. 

    their is a few 1400 owners who fit an external fuel pump, theirs plenty of room under the seat for one. 

    • Like 1
  3. really like the look of the 1400 ET,  thats what Im thinking about with my 1400,  it would be a bit easier to fit/modify ET bodywork to the GSX1400 frame, that way I get to keep the standard wheels and suspension, their will be a lot of work modifying an ET tank though.

  4. 18 minutes ago, johnr said:

    bandit is monoshock, ez is twin shock. you might get the swingarm in, but youve got to fit suspension to it.

    he said he will make shock mounts for it but didn't say if he's going single or twin !!!!!!  

  5. 13 minutes ago, imago said:

    I'm not too fussed about the big tyre thing tbh, my main concern is being able to get some sticky rubber on there and there's plenty of choice in the 160, 170 and 180 widths for 17" rims. So rather than try to squeeze the widest possible into it I'll probably compromise at 170/55 and save myself some work.

    yeah i agree, but still better than the original skinny wheels :D 

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, Toecutter said:

    A 180 is doable, but chain run is tight to frame. A couple of mm at best. Can notch the frame to suit with good results. I've machined sprocket carrier a couple of mms to suit and 3/8 offset front sprocket what have you to line things up accordingly. You Can do all of that and also run a 170 tyre to be on the safe side. 180 tyres don't always measure true 180 depending on manufacturer when fitted. I've had some chains kiss the rear tyre and others not. Hence why I dropped to a 170. Albeit, 170 tyres limit your manufacturer/tyre options. 

    yeah had a 180 on mine, and bang on with the width of different makes of tyre, they do differ. 

    • Like 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Fergie1050 said:

    I’m going to strip it back down this weekend. It was working before I changed the plates and springs. It’s obvious I must have messed up something 

    as I said check the cable as well. 

  8. has you clutch cable got an adjuster half way down its length ?  make sure the cable is all the way in ALL the adjusters, one at the clutch lever, one half way down the cable and one on the top of the crankcase. 

×
×
  • Create New...