Jump to content

Cams vs Big Bore


scotgary

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've used 1166 , 1327 and 1425 cc in my road bikes with different cams / heads. I would definitely go for the 1166 kit. That is a really ice setup for road work. Adjustable cam sprockets and some work on the head and you got a really fun road bike.

Regardent squish  , I have once used 0,5 mm squish in my 1425 cc race engine. I blew one piston and valves...and I used heavy duty rods. So for a street bike - don't go there !

 

Rads Henrik

Posted
On 10/20/2018 at 8:32 AM, Reinhoud said:

Do con rods stretch that much?!!

recently read up on an interesting take on this, so your on the performance trail and have a bit of dosh to go exotic - ok so a set of Ti rods - forsure less reciprocating mass is a good thing - but hold on, Ti doesn't stretch as much as steel - so you replace your steel rods and away yi go - except there's an  edge off the the top end - hmm - soo the steel rod stretches as you hit high rpm, the squish closes up - = faster burn and a bit more compression - the engine kinda gets - self faster the higher the rpm you go - --  swapping in the Ti rods without any other tweeks and you loose this 

ok this is the sort of stuff when you've already got everything else everyone else has and you still want to find that little bit extra :D - eh - i'm usually happy if all cylinders fire up in the desired order of things

rod stretch isn't a bad thing - not accommodating for it is

 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, nlovien said:

recently read up on an interesting take on this, so your on the performance trail and have a bit of dosh to go exotic - ok so a set of Ti rods - forsure less reciprocating mass is a good thing - but hold on, Ti doesn't stretch as much as steel - so you replace your steel rods and away yi go - except there's an  edge off the the top end - hmm - soo the steel rod stretches as you hit high rpm, the squish closes up - = faster burn and a bit more compression - the engine kinda gets - self faster the higher the rpm you go - --  swapping in the Ti rods without any other tweeks and you loose this  

ok this is the sort of stuff when you've already got everything else everyone else has and you still want to find that little bit extra :D - eh - i'm usually happy if all cylinders fire up in the desired order of things

rod stretch isn't a bad thing - not accommodating for it is

  

Yeah, sorry, that's a load of bollocks. Look up the elastic modulus of Ti vs Steel.

Posted

forsure -  I have also read folks commenting it is the opposite way around - i.e. swap the above around - don't have any personal experience with this but my consideration would be on the benefits of the Ti strength to mass ratio - i.e. you have room to increase the cross section of the Ti rod

anyway - this is where I picked the comment up - this guy seems to know what he's doing, a bit whacky in his approach but some interesting stuff http://www.mototuneusa.com/power_news_--_the_factory_superbike.htm

Posted

On a road bike you can't beat a big bore kit. 

 

On a race bike I actually went slower with cams in, but the class didn't allow a bigger bore.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...