Jump to content

imago

Traders
  • Posts

    2,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by imago

  1. 3 minutes ago, DAZ said:

    Regarding the electrical bits'n'bobs , are you planning a box or something in the area immediately behind the headstock , I ask as it would be ideal for the could obviously, but it seems quite a visually large space ,especially compared with say harris mag4 

    I'm going to stick all of the electrical stuff under the seat/tail unit on a tray. There's not going to be loads as I want to keep it pretty basic, switchable fuse panel, ECU for the injection, starter relay (may go by the engine TBD) reg/rec and the battery.

    That'll leave things clear up front for a small GPS speedo a rev counter and minimal idiot lights. I think it'll look better with as much free space as possible up front. At the moment (again TBD) I'm thinking a single large round headlamp. Tthat may change as I have a couple of other possibilities in mind, but it won't be having twins on it.

  2. I just measured width, depth and height, never gave a thought to the frame taper and the width at the carb tops. That'll teach me, but it's all part of the experience. xD

    I'm warming to the injection idea now, and I have most of the stuff I need anyway so it'll be a shit load cheaper to convert it to injection than to buy another set of carbs, jets and dyno time.

    • Like 1
  3. 10 minutes ago, clivegto said:

    Try some 36 CV's. 

    CV's are worse (I have a few sets here) as they're wider at the diaphragm housing. I suspect the GS1000 had smooth bores which are much narrower at the top. The original triple would have been fine.

    Throttle bodies will fit, but I didn't want to go the injection route with this one. Injection, find smaller carbs, manifolds with twin carbs, or change the engine for something else seem to be the only options. None are particularly attractive at the moment, but a bit of thinking space will put things into perspective.

  4. 59 minutes ago, clivegto said:

    Magnum Turbo only has a couple of mm each side fin to frame clearance at front also. 

    It'll be fine as it's snug between the sides rather than at the front. Glad I didn't put the head on first though as there'd have been some bad swears when it became apparent that it wouldn't fit between the rails and had to come off again. xD

  5. 4 minutes ago, clivegto said:

     

    There all keepers xD :tu

    I really can't see me keeping the Dresda for any great length of time. It's been a great frame to use up a load of goodies which I have had for ages without having a suitable bike or project to use them on. I've also enjoyed finding various rare bits and oddities, predominantly from OSS members. (y) I'm really enjoying the build, and it should be a cracking end result which will get a few runs out, taken to a couple of shows and then moved on. The main reason being the riding position with the clip ons would ruin my neck on anything much longer than a half hour ride. So I'm enjoying owning it, but have no particular attachment to it which makes it fairly easy for me to part with it down the line. 

    I could put bars on it but that would look bloody awful on a frame like that IMHO as the tank and overall shape is a lot more slender than the top end of a Harris. It'd look like one of those push bikes from the '70s that we stuck 'cow horns' on. xD

    • Like 2
  6. 3 minutes ago, clivegto said:

    Bang a turbo on and you get both my Harris is making 260hp and 148 ftlb. That's said I'm planning on building a very similar ET motor to this one. 

     

     

    My mate Si had a K4 1000 with a Yoshimura map on it making 180hp and the power delivery was brutal. There wasn't a lot in it in the real world riding on the road comparing it the the 230hp Scratcher at the time. 

    It will be interesting to see your comparison with these 2 builds. 

    All my turbo-ness will be going into the draw through, and I don't fancy the work or bills for getting two air cooled engines in a state to handle that sort of thump. xD

    Yeah, I'm looking forward to seeing how they pan out, but I already know which will be the keeper. :tu

  7. 6 minutes ago, DAZ said:

    The torque is what makes a big engine fun, I know I don't have to explain that to you,I would ALWAYS take 10 ftlb of midrange over 10 bhp at the top end :tu

    Roll on, and getting it in motion from a stand still.

    A high horsepower, higher revving engine is fun, but it gets a bit frenetic. So ticking with the K1 GSXR comparison having the same power two or three thousand rpm lower down the revs with more torque should make for an entertaining ride without being as busy.

    It'll be an interesting comparison to see the increase in torque between stock ET, the Dresda in the 150 - 160 range and the draw through in the 220 - 250 range. 

    • Like 1
  8. As a point of interest, I worked out what it would cost to build an engine like this now from scratch. Five grand is the number I got to, but fortunately all the really expensive stuff and work was bought and done some time ago. This frame just gave me the ideal opportunity to put it all together along with some other tasty bits like the Cowley exhaust.

    I doubt there will be too many air cooled engines getting scratch built to this or a similar spec now. It's just not viable when you can get similar output for 20% of the cost from an oil boiler. :(

  9. 5 minutes ago, DAZ said:

    That's going to be a healthy deep breathing motor, that'll fly in that chassis I'm sure 

    Lightweight race pistons, Upperton prepped bottom end, big valve head, stage 2 cams, Ignitech ignition and 38 mm flat slides. My target is to have similar power and weight to a K1 GSXR100 but with a shit load more torque.

    Either this bike is going to exceed my abilities by some margin or I am am a riding god after all. xD

    • Like 2
  10. 3 minutes ago, clivegto said:

    Have you got everything thing you need to pit it together today. 

    Almost, the main missing components are the stage 2 cams and slotted gears and that's purely down to me not being organised enough to order them before now. I also need/want to slot it into the frame without the head so that I can see if it can come off without dropping the engine or scratching the new powder coat.

    Still got to sort the rear brake calliper mount and sprocket carrier along with spacers for the rear wheel. Just didn't fancy all the measuring and standing at the lathe again today. I'll get the tyres on the rims this coming week hopefully and then I'll be much happier with where it is. (y)

    The new timing plan is to get it as an engine in roller in time to take to Stafford in April if they give @Paulmthe nod for a stand.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...