Jump to content

Keihin FCR 41 Carbs for Big Block


gsxr1385

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's a question for those experienced engine heads on this forum. I am planning a 90 GSXR 1100L big engine build, either a 1342 (83mm x 62mm) or 1385 cc (Bore 83mm x  Stroke 64mm). This will have a heavily worked head as well (ported, big valves, cams etc.); everything in this engine will be heavily worked. I have all the parts ready to start, except those awaiting final engine specs.

 I think I'm settling on Keihin FCR 41 carbs. Picked up a set that has an intake spigot with an ID of 37.5mm, seems small for carbs this size. Per Keihin's charts this spigot was for a GSXR 1100 water-cooled. I found out these spigots will fit the stock 90 GSXR 1100L carb rubber boots (for a BST 36).

However a different intake spigot (33B) can be purchased with an ID of 40mm and will fit the GSXR 750 L&M carb rubbers. I know as I've done this before with a set of FCR 39 with intake spigots (21C) having the same dimensions as the 33b's.

The head will be ported to match the rubbers I use. So the question is what are the pros and cons of using the different size intake spigot / rubber combination? Smaller 37.5mm vs. larger 40mm with a head ported to match?

 

Posted

I won't advise one way or the other except to say I have the big ones for a 1460 engine and using 1100 'M' rubbers when NA and 46mm Taper Throttle Bodies with EFI and turbo, Big motors have big lungs so shouldn't have to breathe through straws.

  • Like 2
Posted

Bigger venturi is the way I was leaning, but reasoned a smaller venturi could increase torque/horsepower at low and mid RPM's vs. larger venturi's (higher velocities better cylinder filling) but would starve at higher RPM's with too much pressure drop through the restriction.

Hmmm 1100 M rubbers - 46mm? May need to look into that...

That's one hell of a motor 1460 … and turbo'd whoa talk about arm stretching !

Posted
8 hours ago, gsxr1385 said:

Hmmm 1100 M rubbers - 46mm? May need to look into that...

That's one hell of a motor 1460 … and turbo'd whoa talk about arm stretching !

Hmmm - confusion! 'M' rubbers won't take 46mm spigots - i've made tapered adapters from 46 to 40mm to suit the rubbers!

The motor was built for a turbo, lower CR, turbo cams and timing and yes it was an arm stretcher but it has no shortage of torque when used NA. - FCR's , Akro pipe & Dyna2000

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/27/2020 at 5:05 AM, Gixer1460 said:

Hmmm - confusion! 'M' rubbers won't take 46mm spigots - i've made tapered adapters from 46 to 40mm to suit the rubbers!

The motor was built for a turbo, lower CR, turbo cams and timing and yes it was an arm stretcher but it has no shortage of torque when used NA. - FCR's , Akro pipe & Dyna2000

Thanks for the clarification … I read in the carb/rubber sticky that rubbers from 1100 M&N are 45mm ID (for BST 40mm?)… checked afterwards from parts suppliers  that the rubbers for the 1100 (USA) K/L,(BST 36), and  1100 M/N (BST 40?) are all the same so was confused. Guess I'll stick with 750 L/M rubbers.

Wish I could have watched your engine build!

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, gsxr1385 said:

I read in the carb/rubber sticky that rubbers from 1100 M&N are 45mm ID (for BST 40mm?)

Just after double checking a set of 1100 M rubbers, measured 45mm inner diameter. 

I have FCR 39'S to go with them. The spigots are marked 21C which correlate to Kehin code SKU 020-444. Could not be a better fit. Same sipot is used on Keihins for SV650's btw.

spigot.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...