gsxr1385 Posted March 26, 2020 Posted March 26, 2020 Here's a question for those experienced engine heads on this forum. I am planning a 90 GSXR 1100L big engine build, either a 1342 (83mm x 62mm) or 1385 cc (Bore 83mm x Stroke 64mm). This will have a heavily worked head as well (ported, big valves, cams etc.); everything in this engine will be heavily worked. I have all the parts ready to start, except those awaiting final engine specs. I think I'm settling on Keihin FCR 41 carbs. Picked up a set that has an intake spigot with an ID of 37.5mm, seems small for carbs this size. Per Keihin's charts this spigot was for a GSXR 1100 water-cooled. I found out these spigots will fit the stock 90 GSXR 1100L carb rubber boots (for a BST 36). However a different intake spigot (33B) can be purchased with an ID of 40mm and will fit the GSXR 750 L&M carb rubbers. I know as I've done this before with a set of FCR 39 with intake spigots (21C) having the same dimensions as the 33b's. The head will be ported to match the rubbers I use. So the question is what are the pros and cons of using the different size intake spigot / rubber combination? Smaller 37.5mm vs. larger 40mm with a head ported to match? Quote
Gixer1460 Posted March 26, 2020 Posted March 26, 2020 I won't advise one way or the other except to say I have the big ones for a 1460 engine and using 1100 'M' rubbers when NA and 46mm Taper Throttle Bodies with EFI and turbo, Big motors have big lungs so shouldn't have to breathe through straws. 2 Quote
gsxr1385 Posted March 27, 2020 Author Posted March 27, 2020 Bigger venturi is the way I was leaning, but reasoned a smaller venturi could increase torque/horsepower at low and mid RPM's vs. larger venturi's (higher velocities better cylinder filling) but would starve at higher RPM's with too much pressure drop through the restriction. Hmmm 1100 M rubbers - 46mm? May need to look into that... That's one hell of a motor 1460 … and turbo'd whoa talk about arm stretching ! Quote
Gixer1460 Posted March 27, 2020 Posted March 27, 2020 8 hours ago, gsxr1385 said: Hmmm 1100 M rubbers - 46mm? May need to look into that... That's one hell of a motor 1460 … and turbo'd whoa talk about arm stretching ! Hmmm - confusion! 'M' rubbers won't take 46mm spigots - i've made tapered adapters from 46 to 40mm to suit the rubbers! The motor was built for a turbo, lower CR, turbo cams and timing and yes it was an arm stretcher but it has no shortage of torque when used NA. - FCR's , Akro pipe & Dyna2000 1 Quote
gsxr1385 Posted March 30, 2020 Author Posted March 30, 2020 On 3/27/2020 at 5:05 AM, Gixer1460 said: Hmmm - confusion! 'M' rubbers won't take 46mm spigots - i've made tapered adapters from 46 to 40mm to suit the rubbers! The motor was built for a turbo, lower CR, turbo cams and timing and yes it was an arm stretcher but it has no shortage of torque when used NA. - FCR's , Akro pipe & Dyna2000 Thanks for the clarification … I read in the carb/rubber sticky that rubbers from 1100 M&N are 45mm ID (for BST 40mm?)… checked afterwards from parts suppliers that the rubbers for the 1100 (USA) K/L,(BST 36), and 1100 M/N (BST 40?) are all the same so was confused. Guess I'll stick with 750 L/M rubbers. Wish I could have watched your engine build! Quote
Jaydee Posted March 30, 2020 Posted March 30, 2020 22 minutes ago, gsxr1385 said: I read in the carb/rubber sticky that rubbers from 1100 M&N are 45mm ID (for BST 40mm?) Just after double checking a set of 1100 M rubbers, measured 45mm inner diameter. I have FCR 39'S to go with them. The spigots are marked 21C which correlate to Kehin code SKU 020-444. Could not be a better fit. Same sipot is used on Keihins for SV650's btw. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.