Jump to content

RGSX

Members
  • Posts

    786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RGSX

  1. 7 hours ago, no class said:

    just use the 83 gs1100 

    I'll give that a try with Gear Commander and see what I can come up. Sprocket of 17 or 18T seems to be common choices up front, for the rear anything from 43 to 50. Chain length is still a mystery.

    No listings for the efe seems to be more common than I expected,  I've come across a number of other web sites which also have a gap for 84-86 efe.

    I did find a UK website has a complete  conversion kit but shipping costs were horrendous($100 CDN). I'll need to piece something together from N American suppliers.

     

     

  2. Gear Commander is great tool for sprocket calculation. Except for one oversight,  it seems to list every bike Suzuki ever made... except the 84-86 GS1150/1100efe. xD

    Maybe I can still make it work if I dig a little deeper for technical info.

  3. I've been searching the web for 2hours searching info on chain conversion for my 84 1150efe from the oem 630  to a 530.  I'm finding conflicting options and products. I'm sure this anything new to this forum if want to share your experience it would be helpful.

    I did find a 18T front sprocket with a 5/8" offset at www.suzukiperformancespares.co.uk  . From what I've read   17t or 18t seem to be the  most common choice.

    What is the equivalent 630 rear sprocket tooth count for a 530 rear sprocket?

    Chain length?

    I came across a website that recommended the EK MVYZ chain, is it a good choice?

     

     

  4. Unsprung weight is different and more critical than sprung weight in performance of the bike. I could lose 30lbs of personal weight and it would help in acceleration but keeping the tires in contact with the road and changes in direction is more dependant on reducing unsprung weight. Lighter wheels, sprockets, lighter rotors, chain,  20 grams x 6 here and there add up. The technician that does the critical work on my bikes has spent time as a Crew Chief on the WorldSBK circuit  says the correct priority for performance modification  is to "Look after the suspension first, it needs to turn."

    Reducing weight can be as expensive adding hp and torque but the cumulative effects of weight saved can remarkably change how the bike handles. How fast you can go in a straight line doesn't matter much if it can't turn safely on a rough surface.

     

  5. 2 hours ago, Gixer1460 said:

    I did wonder this myself !

    If someone can't use a junior hacksaw, a file and a drill, they shouldn't be modifying motorcycles ! ! ! 

    Some people have only the most basic tools, some don't even have a shed to store their tools or to do their work in, they do what they can with what they have.

    No one knows how to modify a motorcycle until they begin with their first one, that includes you and I.

    • Like 3
  6. 16 hours ago, Joseph said:

    A quick calculation based on 2 mil thick aluminium plate weighs in at a whopping 20 grams for 2 block off plates

    I'll sit back and wait for someone to tell me that would be noticeable on a barge weight of a bike on crappy everyday roads.

    LoL

    ¬¬Unsprung weight is mass in motion, it has momentum and kinetic energy. A change in motion (going up and down) results in a change of momentum and requires a force applied over a period of time. The effects of unsprung motion are amplified as is the weight by a factor of 6, every gm lost matters they add up it's why manufacturers of performance bikes and aftermarket performance parts pay attention to shaving off grams everywhere, it's cumulative. Lighter caliper, sprockets, tires, titanium bolts all shave off grams, it's why forks were inverted.

    Reducing usprung weight matters keeping wheels in contact with those crappy roads.

  7. 1 hour ago, Joseph said:

    alloy plate cut to shape and drilled, gasket paper and put the antidives back on ? Shouldn't be harder than that

    I suspect anyone looking for the block off plates doesn't have the means to make any for themselves. Adding block off plates to the anti-dive units is preserving the look but is adding unsprung weight.

  8. 1 hour ago, slayer61 said:

    Why was I of the opinion that the plates needed a channel from hole-to-hole to allow the oil to pass? I think mine were like that...

     

     

    That's true.

    There are several methods to disable the anti-dive discussed on the GSresources forum https://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showthread.php?257845-Block-off-plate-for-anti-dive&highlight=disable+anti-dive

    Block off plates, block the feed line, gut the anti-dive unit, RaceTech emulators. The 1st Block off plates, probably the least attractive looking and most expensive for what you get,plus more unsprung weight. The 2nd and 3rd very inexpensive, you keep the look , unsprung weight stays the same.  The 4th, the gold valve emulators combined with racetech springs really upgrade the suspension performance by several decades. If you have a drill press you could install them yourself.

  9. There are several ways that don't require plates. When I looked into the cost of the plate kits it was was pricey for what you were getting. I applied that cost towards Race Tech Emulators their install eliminates the anti-dive feature and supplies much improved suspension and you can keep the oldskool look of the anti dive units. I've seen a few bikes with the block off plates but imo the anti-dive units look better.

    IMG_2642.thumb.jpg.93d9f562ed785f0cc2f7a4582fb356d1.jpg

    • Like 2
  10. On 1/11/2021 at 2:39 PM, eightball_hotrod said:

    hi all

    could someone please tell me the correct dimensions of nr 41 ?

    suzuki-gs1150ef-1984-e-usa-e03-cowling-model-ff2_big3IMG00901464_3952.thumb.gif.4080a398997ef5833f8eaef742f9c90f.gif

    looks like they are out of stock from suzuki :|

    no problem to hacksaw 2 but in the correct length would be good ;)

    thanks in advance

    rené

    L -40mm  Dia -15mm

  11. 6 hours ago, TonyGee said:

    maybe your clutch need looking at ? 

    I likely have the best tuner/mechanic in the country he takes my bikes for vigorous test rides when I leave them with him for tuning. If there was a serious issue with the clutch he would've mentioned it along with the other deficiencies he makes note of.

    I do intend to install a HD clutch in a year or two when I go with a big bore.

  12. I had no idea the 1100 was in short supply, I came across one last year summer that I could've picked up for a couple hundred . In hindsight I should've bought it as I recall four years ago I two offers over $1k for my engine when it still had two broken plugs still frozen in the head and hadn't run in 25-30 years.

    Rebuilt head, RS36 mikuni's and headers it has amazing mid range torque and an exceptional tuner, my mechanic figures 130 rear wheel hp.  With with an overbore he estimates it'll be somewhere around 140-145hp at the rear. I'll definitely need to upgrade the clutch.

  13. On 10/31/2020 at 7:31 AM, yantosh said:

    robber will just throw it in a van, he won't care what colour wires you have  :ph34r:

    Yup deal with the alarms and locks later.   Saw it happen on youtube, van pulled up alongside and in less than 30 seconds it was gone.

    • Like 1
  14. On 6/23/2020 at 12:57 PM, Finn said:

    Hello.

    Acquired this EFE during the weekend. I'm going through basic things and would like to ask what are the stock factory suspension settings front and rear?

    Not yet owner's manual to check for this info, I'm afraid.

     

    OfDSrov.jpg

    That's the exact year and colour as mine, well it was until I got bored and changed it up. As mine is a Canadian sale it's an 1150efe

×
×
  • Create New...