Jump to content

crashtester

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by crashtester

  1. 6 hours ago, Rene EFE said:

    Do these fit the std gear then; disks, cushdrive, etc?

    Dymag will make any of their wheels in the standard fitment for just about any bike. As Dezza says, they come with their ow sprocket/cush drive on the rear. The front will be the standard disc bolt pattern and support the standard speedo drive. I think it is the same for other aftermarket wheel manufacturers like Marchesini and Galespeed, you can order then to suit.

  2. 3 hours ago, dupersunc said:

    750 and 1100 are the same fitment. ZX9r, and some zx6r resets fit with some very minor fettling.

    I was told the Kawasaki's use a M8 mounting bolt, whereas the slingshots use M10. Haven't verified this for myself.

  3. Does it still have the tank mount rubbers on the frame? I think on the 91 and 92 they are screwed on, whereas they are glued on with the 89 and 90 frames. The top shock mount is bolted on with the 89, so that is another thing you could look for. I think the subframe on the 91 and 92 models is different, but I'm not 100% sure and whether it's easy to pick in photos. Hopefully some else can confirm this.

  4. Yes, running a 180. Can't give you a direct comparison with a 160 as I upgraded the suspension and swapped the wheel at the same time. The combined changes were a massive improvement. If you source a 5.5 rear wheel for it you will also need the corresponding cush drive for the chain to clear the tyre, as the one on the K is a little narrower. Also get the torque rod arm as the K one will rub on the tyre, although I think some people just bend it to clear. The wider wheel will put the chain alignment out by 3.7mm (I think I am remembering that correctly), which you can get away with or get an offset front sprocket made. Also, the 180 tyre won't fit inside the hugger.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...