Jump to content

liner material removal to reduce pumping losses


baldrick

Recommended Posts

hello, Way back in the midst of time i remember reading about some tuning houses  "windowing "the bottom of the barrel liners, in an attempt to reduce pumping losses. 

This usually involved  die grinding, i presume,  material off the  liners, below the travel of the pistons, between 1 and 2 cyl and again between 3 and 4.  this was in the shape of a sort of square/rectangle, with rounded corners iirc.

AFAIK, the idea was to reduce pumping losses and, allegedly, it did in fact help with power increases, although it was pretty marginal .

Anyone ever done thisor have any direct experience of what was involved, amount removed etc.

 

Cheers

Link to comment

Yeah I've had it done with overbored GSX and GSXR barrels. From memory cut was about 30 - 40mm wide and 20 - 25mm deep. Whether it achieved anything was undetectable as it was done with other tuning work at same time but as the 1st shop that did it was a fairly successful race bike shop, I wasn't going to argue and demand proof LOL!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I'm a bit late on this one ! G1460 has said it all really.  Did it on mine, partly to help pumping losses and partly to reduce the amount of air shoved around the cases. It can't hurt, it probably helps a bit and it's easy enough to do. I tried to find an old photo of mine, showing the windows on 1 and 2, 3 and 4 facing each other, it must be on my old laptop ?!

Link to comment

Many years ago John Robinson and Leon Moss conducted a series of tests to find the mechanical losses incurred driving an engine. The resulting magazine article found that crankcase "pumping" accounted for quite a large proportion of the losses and worthy of further investigation. 

Basically, the less power you waste between piston and sprocket,  the more power you have to drive the rear wheel. It may only be a small amount but lots of little gains all add up.:banana:

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/3/2022 at 8:19 PM, Oilyspanner said:

found the photo of when I was shaping the windows. I remember Suzuki saying they helped the gsxr1000k3  gain about 3hp (in crankcase on modern engines).20171122_180740.thumb.jpg.0fcf1da96d21fe568740d20a6d8feac8.jpg

Ok so I'll be the one to ask the question - how does cutting the liners in that way reduce pumping losses?

Link to comment
6 hours ago, gsxr1385 said:

Ok so I'll be the one to ask the question - how does cutting the liners in that way reduce pumping losses?

Imagine the pistons moving next to one another, as 1 is going down, 2 is going up. Without the window the air below 1 is forced into the crank case which causes back pressure, and that in turn needs a bit of energy to overcome.

With the window the air can escape much sooner and goes straight into the 'draw' caused by 2 going up. So it shortens the track for the air, which reduces the delay between being forced out and drawn in. That reduction in time and pressure reduces the amount of energy needed to move the piston.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
On 10/27/2022 at 6:45 PM, Gixer1460 said:

Yeah I've had it done with overbored GSX and GSXR barrels. From memory cut was about 30 - 40mm wide and 20 - 25mm deep. Whether it achieved anything was undetectable as it was done with other tuning work at same time but as the 1st shop that did it was a fairly successful race bike shop, I wasn't going to argue and demand proof LOL!

It´s probably not working on GSX engines, because there are walls between the cylinders.

Or have you opened the walls and if so, doesn´t it make the engine block weaker?

Link to comment
7 hours ago, imago said:

Imagine the pistons moving next to one another, as 1 is going down, 2 is going up. Without the window the air below 1 is forced into the crank case which causes back pressure, and that in turn needs a bit of energy to overcome.

With the window the air can escape much sooner and goes straight into the 'draw' caused by 2 going up. So it shortens the track for the air, which reduces the delay between being forced out and drawn in. That reduction in time and pressure reduces the amount of energy needed to move the piston.

I appreciate that explanation. I am not trying to be contrary, but the volume of air in the crankcase is not changing at all by the travels of piston 1 and 2, regardless of those windows. No new displacement is being added or taken away with those windows, and the argument of shorter path (and time) for crankcase volume to be moved via those windows vs. drawn from lower (perhaps 1 inch?) in the crankcase just doesn't account for lower or higher crankcase pressure.

That doesn't even take into account the crankcase is vented to either atmospheric pressure or into the airbox (less than atmospheric pressure). If the crankcase vent isn't large enough to reduce crankcase pressure, it would be more effective to reduce crankcase pressure in other ways. Engine temperatures are also a major contributor to increase in crankcase pressure.

I wouldn't bother to cut those windows

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, gsxr1385 said:

I appreciate that explanation. I am not trying to be contrary, but the volume of air in the crankcase is not changing at all by the travels of piston 1 and 2, regardless of those windows. No new displacement is being added or taken away with those windows, and the argument of shorter path (and time) for crankcase volume to be moved via those windows vs. drawn from lower (perhaps 1 inch?) in the crankcase just doesn't account for lower or higher crankcase pressure.

That doesn't even take into account the crankcase is vented to either atmospheric pressure or into the airbox (less than atmospheric pressure). If the crankcase vent isn't large enough to reduce crankcase pressure, it would be more effective to reduce crankcase pressure in other ways. Engine temperatures are also a major contributor to increase in crankcase pressure.

I wouldn't bother to cut those windows

OK. Thanks for sharing. (y)

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Blower1 said:

It´s probably not working on GSX engines, because there are walls between the cylinders.

Or have you opened the walls and if so, doesn´t it make the engine block weaker?

I'm only responding to the question asked. If done with a GSX then obvs the web is cut also and seeing as the GSXR did away with that feature I don't personally think block integrity is compromised.

Link to comment
51 minutes ago, gsxr1385 said:

I appreciate that explanation. I am not trying to be contrary, but the volume of air in the crankcase is not changing at all by the travels of piston 1 and 2, regardless of those windows. No new displacement is being added or taken away with those windows, and the argument of shorter path (and time) for crankcase volume to be moved via those windows vs. drawn from lower (perhaps 1 inch?) in the crankcase just doesn't account for lower or higher crankcase pressure.

That doesn't even take into account the crankcase is vented to either atmospheric pressure or into the airbox (less than atmospheric pressure). If the crankcase vent isn't large enough to reduce crankcase pressure, it would be more effective to reduce crankcase pressure in other ways. Engine temperatures are also a major contributor to increase in crankcase pressure.

I wouldn't bother to cut those windows

The volume isn't changed but you do have displacement and flow. As it's actually an oil air mist, it's quite dense, so takes even more energy to move it the air volume around the crankcase. The energy required is squared as the speed of the piston doubles, so at 10,000rpm you are using a lot of energy to move the mist around the crank case, that energy is turned into heat, which causes more power loss.  Shorten the path via windows in the liners, or by smoothing the edges of the webs in the crank to improve flow for the displaced air/oil mist reduces the energy it takes to do so.

all well proven physics. It's why race engines run dry sumps with a depression in the crank case and have huge amounts of detail work on the inside of the cases.  Ducati even run vacuum pumps on wet sump engines.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...